ArticleACS environmental Au2026
The Elemental Composition of Land Plants: A Global Database and Meta-analysis.
Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although plants likely take up all elements present in the soil environment, the elemental composition of land plants remains poorly characterized beyond essential nutrients. A comprehensive global database of plant tissue concentrations spanning 52 elements was compiled from 5,474 samples across 73 countries, 21 climate classes, and 26 soil groups. Robust global means for macronutrients, micronutrients, transition and heavy metals, metalloids, and rare earth elements are reported using mixed-effects models that account for study level variation. Global concentrations are also reported for roots and shoots, domesticated and wild plants, edible and nonedible plants, N-fixation symbiosis, and for various plant types including trees, shrubs, vines, forbs, sedges, grasses, ferns, and mosses. Many nonessential elements (i.e. transition metals, rare earth elements) exist in plant tissues in higher concentrations than micronutrients, with 20 elements higher than Mo. Phylogenetic analyses across major plant lineages revealed strong evolutionary constraints on elemental composition, with Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models indicating stabilizing selection toward lineage-specific optima for most elements. The plant elements most likely to predict taxonomic grouping through unsupervised machine learning (XGBoost) followed S > Ca > N > Zn > Ba > Cu > Pb > Sb > Cd > P. Multivariate ordinations separated domesticated crops from wild species, driven primarily by macronutrient enrichment in crops. Further, key atomic ratios differed between domesticated and wild plants, driven by differences in Zn:Cd, K:Na, N:S, and N:P. Systematic hyperaccumulator identification revealed 53 species across diverse taxa, with high Ni, Cu, and Pb uptake as the most prevalent indicator of hyperaccumulation. The study provides reliable and comprehensive estimates of the elemental composition of land plants and highlights that lesser studied elements constitute a considerable fraction of plant tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.