Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787931›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2026

Discrepancy between Occupational Exposure Levels and Health Risks Limits the Health Benefits of a Concentration-Oriented VOC Regulation Strategy.

Di Wang, Jinmin Zhao, Xinmin Zhang, Zhihao Zhang, Rongshuo Zhang, Weiqi Zhang, Wenjuan Zhao, Xia Shao, Lei Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Di WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-7319
Jinmin ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Xinmin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Zhihao ZhangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Rongshuo ZhangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Weiqi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Wenjuan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-9440
Xia ShaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Urban Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds Pollution Control and Application, Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China.
Lei NieBeijing Key Laboratory of Urban Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds Pollution Control and Application, Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are strictly controlled worldwide. However, the gap between VOC regulation and health effects has increased owing to the complexity of characterizing deleterious species and understanding their hazards. By identifying the differences in exposure patterns among VOC-related industries, we examined occupational exposure profiles in 24 industries by analyzing 557 samples collected in breathing zones. The high-end exposure level was used to estimate aggregate health risk, and the cumulative risks for affected organs/tissues were then assessed individually by using the dose addition and response addition method. The results revealed an obvious discrepancy between the exposure level and health risk in complicated industrial settings. Low VOC exposure might significantly threaten health, whereas high exposure might have only a slight effect on health, suggesting a transition of the VOC regulation strategy from total concentration reduction to risk reduction. High-level exposure to acrolein, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,2-dibromoethane, formaldehyde, and methyl methacrylate poses the highest risk to the respiratory system. We further developed an understanding that total VOC concentration reductions do not bring an equal proportion of health benefits in most industries. These conclusions highlight the importance of considering both health and atmospheric chemistry in determining VOC limits and promoting industrial sustainability.

Indexed as

aggregate health riskcumulative health riskgaseous organic mixtureindustrial fugitive emissionrisk prevention

Identifiers

PMID42787931
PMCPMC13602344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.