ArticleOtology & neurotology open2026
Access and Attrition Across Audiology and Cochlear Implant Care Among Older Adults with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Article in Otology & neurotology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify progression through the hearing care pathway among US adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and describe variation across geographic and community contexts. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Epic Cosmos Database, January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2024. Patients: Adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral SNHL identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Stage-specific unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for progression across audiology evaluation, cochlear implant evaluation, and cochlear implantation. Statistical significance was defined as Results: Among 1,461,489 older adults with bilateral SNHL, 746,118 (51.1%) underwent audiology evaluation; fewer than 2% received cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, while approximately 64% of those evaluated for cochlear implantation proceeded to surgery. Marked stage-specific attrition was observed. Adults aged 85 years or older had lower odds of audiology access, higher odds of candidacy evaluation, and lower odds of cochlear implantation. Black and Asian patients had lower odds of candidacy evaluation. Women were less likely to undergo candidacy evaluation but more likely to receive implantation once evaluated for candidacy. Patients living farther from a cochlear implant center and those in rural areas had higher odds of both candidacy evaluation and cochlear implantation, a counterintuitive finding that likely reflects a selection effect among patients who overcome distance barriers rather than improved geographic access. Conclusions: In this national cohort, disparities along the cochlear implant care pathway were associated less with audiologic access due to distance and more with attrition at cochlear implant candidacy assessment. Candidacy referral and evaluation represent a critical, potentially modifiable bottleneck for improving equity in hearing care among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.