ArticleiScience2026
Applying ComBat harmonization to ultrasomics enhances machine learning generalizability and performance in multi-center clinical settings.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasomics features suffer from multi-source batch effects across centers, including scanning parameters, scanners, and operator variability, limiting the generalizability of machine learning models and impeding their clinical translation. In this study, we systematically validated ComBat harmonization for reducing ultrasomics heterogeneity with a tiered validation framework: phantoms, retrospective clinical thyroid studies, and prospective multi-center human studies. ComBat reduced the proportion of heterogeneous features to below 51%. The concordance correlation coefficients were improved by up to 135%. When models were retrained on harmonized data using features selected pre-harmonization, average AUCs were significantly improved; further gains from optimized feature selection post-harmonization increased average AUCs to up to 0.93, with robust effectiveness across both population screening and high-risk referral settings. Our study suggests that ComBat harmonization can effectively reduce technical heterogeneity in ultrasomics features, serving as a promising tool to enhance the generalizability of machine learning models in ultrasomics research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.