ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
National Medicare trends in navigation-assisted spine surgery: A temporal and geographic analysis.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although initially utilized for pedicle screw placement, indications for navigation assistance in spine surgery have expanded over the past several years. While existing studies have evaluated safety, efficacy, and outcomes from navigation assistance, national reimbursement, and utilization patterns remain poorly characterized. This study aims to quantify temporal, geographic, and provider-level trends in navigation-assisted spine surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. Materials and Methods: The Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files were queried for national utilization and reimbursements for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 61783 (add-on code for navigation-assisted spine surgery) from 2011 to 2024. Additional Medicare databases were queried for geographic- and physician-level trends in navigation assistance utilization from 2013 to 2023. Linear regression was performed on national utilization trends. Results: From 2011 to 2024, allowed services for navigation-assisted spine surgery grew 917.41%, from 3447 in 2011 to 35,070 in 2024. Adjusting for growth in the number of Medicare Part B beneficiaries, this represents a 637.03% increase. In 2023, most physicians performing navigation-assisted spine surgery were neurosurgeons and practiced in urban metropolitan settings. Between 2013 and 2023, all 50 states observed an increase in utilization rate for navigation-assisted spine surgeries. From 2011 to 2024, reimbursements for this add-on code steadily declined by 31.78%, from $334.88 to $228.45. Conclusions: As indications have expanded, utilization of the navigation-assisted spine surgery CPT code has increased sixfold from its introduction in 2011 to 2024. Simultaneously, reimbursements have declined by 31.78%, raising important concerns about misalignment between the clinical value and financial support for navigation-assisted spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.