ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2026
Promoting Flexibility in Expectations: A Randomized-Controlled Online-Intervention Study for Mild Psychopathological Symptoms.
Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research demonstrates that mental disorders are associated with specific dysfunctional expectations and a reduced ability to adjust them, even after expectation-violating experiences. The Method: This study examines the effectiveness of an online EFPI platform for individuals with mild depressive and/or anxiety symptoms. A total of 128 participants, screened with the PHQ-9 (scores 5-9) and/or BAI (scores 8-25), were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The EFPI group and the active control group (ACG) received a psychoeducational video about expectations and their influence on behavior. Over four weeks, the EFPI group completed behavioral experiments to test their personal expectations, while the ACG used only cognitive strategies to challenge personal expectations. A third group (control group; CG) received no intervention. Surveys were administered at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks after the initial assessment. Results: A significant reduction in cognitive immunization was observed over measurement timepoints, with a significant difference to the CG at the follow-up. Anxiety symptoms appear to moderate this effect, whereas EFPI did not influence depressive symptoms, nor did depressive symptoms moderate changes in cognitive immunization. Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate online EFPI for mild depression and/or anxiety symptoms, suggesting that EFPI may reduce cognitive immunization. Future studies should investigate therapist-delivered EFPI in clinical populations with more severe symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.