ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2026
Development of a fetal renal ultrasound score for predicting neonatal renal dysfunction.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal renal dysfunction is a congenital abnormality of renal development caused by disrupted interaction between the ureteric bud and the metanephric blastema, resulting in disorganized renal parenchyma and variable degrees of functional impairment. Prenatal diagnosis remains challenging due to the limited specificity of ultrasound findings and the frequent need for postnatal confirmation. A standardized prenatal ultrasound score may improve identification of fetuses at higher risk of neonatal renal dysfunction among those with suspected renal abnormalities. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study including 59 pregnancies with fetuses showing ultrasound features suggestive of renal pathology. A prenatal ultrasound score was constructed using five routinely assessed parameters: renal parenchymal hyperechogenicity, hydronephrosis severity, renal longitudinal diameter, corticomedullary differentiation, and amniotic fluid index. Postnatal renal outcome was determined using clinical, radiological, and/or histopathological data. Results: A prenatal ultrasound score ≥ 6 was associated with a predicted probability of neonatal renal dysfunction exceeding 50%. A progressive dose-response relationship was observed between increasing prenatal scores and adverse renal outcomes. Fetuses diagnosed postnatally with neonatal renal dysfunction had significantly higher prenatal ultrasound scores compared with those with similar prenatal findings but preserved renal function at birth. Conclusions: A composite prenatal ultrasound score integrating routinely assessed renal parameters is associated with neonatal renal dysfunction in fetuses with suspected renal pathology. Higher scores identify an increasing risk of adverse renal outcome and may support prenatal prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.