ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2026
Efficacy and safety of diazepam nasal spray in Japanese Pediatric patients with or at risk for status epilepticus: a phase 3, Multicenter, open-label clinical trial.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diazepam nasal spray (tradename: SPYDIA in Japan, VALTOCO® in the US) following single (Part 1) and multiple (Part 2) dose administrations in pediatric epilepsy patients. Methods: Patients aged 6-17 years with status epilepticus (SE) or at risk for progression to SE despite stable antiseizure medication were eligible. In Part 1, a single intranasal dose (5, 10, or 15 mg) was administered immediately after the onset of a prespecified convulsive seizure. The primary endpoint was the responder rate (seizures ceasing within 10 min post-dose without recurrence for 30 min) in this part. In Part 2, multiple doses were administered for up to 24 weeks to assess efficacy and safety. Results: From November 2022 and January 2024, 22 participants were enrolled in Part 1; 16 were treated. The responder rate was 62.5% (10/16; 95% CI, 35.4-84.8), with the lower CI limit exceeding the 30% threshold. In Part 2, 14 participants treated 91 seizures; 71.4% ceased within 10 min without recurrence for 12 h. Overall, 18 participants received diazepam nasal spray; 14 (77.8%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAEs led to discontinuation, and all treatment-related TEAEs were mild. Treatment satisfaction ("very" or "fairly" satisfied) was reported by 15/16 (93.8%) and 15/17 (88.2%) participants in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: These findings support the favorable efficacy and safety profiles of diazepam nasal spray as a rescue therapy in pediatric patients with or at risk for SE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.