ArticleSynthetic and systems biotechnology2027
Hijacking host RNA polymerase for processive in situ mutagenesis.
Article in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted mutagenesis is a crucial tool for in vivo continuous evolution. However, existing methods for long-range targeted mutagenesis in vivo often face limitations such as low efficiency, poor host compatibility, operational complexity, and uneven distribution of mutations across these windows. In this study, we developed a novel in vivo Targeted Assisted Mutagenesis via Endogenous RNAP tool (TAMER) by functionally fusing the endogenous ω subunit of RNAP with a deaminase and dCas9. This tool achieved a mutagenesis efficiency of 1.28 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.