ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
De-implementation of inequitable methadone policy and treatment: lessons learned from COVID-19 to support a more just methadone treatment system in the United States.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of evidence supporting methadone as a life-saving treatment for opioid use disorder, its delivery in the US has been stymied by stigmatizing dispensation policies that are neither evidence-based nor person-centered. Implementation failures and regulatory challenges have resulted in a significant treatment gap in the US and less than 30% of people with OUD enter and remain in treatment. In this article, we provide a historical overview of the methadone treatment (MT) system in the US and outline why it requires de-implementation. We present the COVID-19 public health emergency as a naturalistic experiment in de-implementation, outline evidence from this period on how COVID-19 related flexibilities influenced treatment outcomes and patient experiences and present a de-implementation framework to contextualize these changes while imagining further expansion of de-implementation efforts to support sustained change. We highlight how patient advocacy can shape further de-implementation while noting current threats to progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.