ArticleClinical hematology international2026
Transplant outcomes after intensive chemotherapy or venetoclax plus azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present retrospective multicenter study in Japan evaluated the role of venetoclax plus azacitidine (V/A) before first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 144 transplant-eligible acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Thirty-seven patients received V/A prior to SCT, mainly as salvage therapy for refractory and adverse-risk AML. Patients were classified into four groups according to remission status at SCT and V/A use. The 1-year overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of those who achieved complete remission (CR) with intensive chemotherapy (IC) were 93%, 5% and 4%, respectively. The 1-year OS, CIR and NRM of those who were refractory/intolerant to IC and achieved CR with V/A were 93%, 7% and 7%, respectively. The 1-year OS, CIR and NRM of those who were refractory to IC and proceeded directly to SCT were 52%, 54% and 13%, respectively. The 1-year OS, CIR and NRM of those who were refractory/intolerant to IC and refractory to V/A were 41%, 39% and 29%, respectively. Overall, use of V/A prior to SCT salvaged some AML patients who were refractory/intolerant to IC, and the transplant outcomes of these patients were favorable. Further studies are needed to optimize treatment for AML prior to SCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.