Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787682›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Patient Empowerment and Agency through Intrapartum Counseling and Education (PEAICE): A randomized controlled trial.

Samuel J F Melville, Lorraine Codding, Blake M Lee, Mónica Rincón, Bharti Garg, Katherine Lyons, Fei Cai

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06787521 (PEAICE), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06787521 nacompletednot on this map

PEAICE: Patient Empowerment and Agency Through Intrapartum Counseling and Education: a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled216ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsevidence-based labor guide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel J F MelvilleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Lorraine CoddingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8682-3726
Blake M LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Mónica RincónDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-585X
Bharti GargDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-0623
Katherine LyonsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Fei CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As more patients decline evidence-based care from their obstetric providers, effective and accessible antenatal education is essential in reversing this course. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a novel low-cost physical intrapartum labor guide on personal perceptions of patient control, labor satisfaction, and obstetric/neonatal outcomes. Methods: This was a single-institution, randomized controlled trial of patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor. Participants were randomized at admission for induction to intrapartum guide versus standard of care counseling. Primary outcomes included personal perception of control and satisfaction during labor (assessed via the Labor Agentry Scale [LAS] and a six-question satisfaction survey, administered ≤7 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes included prespecified obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Comparisons between groups were done using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test or two-sample Results: A total of 216 patients were enrolled and randomized (108 per arm). Of those enrolled, 189 (87.5%) completed the postpartum survey ≤7 days postpartum and were thus included in the analysis. Compared to standard of care, patients in the intrapartum guide group had significantly higher mean LAS scores (58.36 [95% CI, 56.78-59.94] vs. 54.29 [95% CI, 52.45-56.13]; Conclusion: A novel, low-cost intrapartum labor guide administered during induction of labor significantly increased patient-perceived agency and satisfaction. This represents a promising strategy for improving patient adoption and fidelity of labor education regarding evidence for interventions that potentially reduce obstetric/neonatal risk. The findings of this study warrant further study and implementation in obstetric practices. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06787521.

Indexed as

childbirthinductionlaborpatient educationpatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42787682
PMCPMC13601936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.