ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026
Acute caffeine strategies for improving performance in combat sports: a structured narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This structured narrative review updates and contextualizes evidence on acute caffeine strategies in combat sports, with emphasis on performance effects, delivery form, combined interventions, and factors that may explain inconsistent findings. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus. Eligible reports involved trained amateur, competitive, or professional combat sport athletes, evaluated an acute caffeine intervention administered before or during exercise or sport specific performance testing, and included at least one physical, cognitive, or technical tactical performance outcome. Findings were synthesized narratively because of substantial heterogeneity in sport discipline, caffeine protocol, comparator, and outcome measures. Results: Forty three reports met the eligibility criteria. Fourteen evaluated combined caffeine protocols, whereas 29 evaluated caffeine supplementation alone. Combined protocols included caffeine with sodium bicarbonate, carbohydrate, L theanine, Rhodiola rosea, warm up music, conditioning activity, post activation performance enhancement, or mouth rinsing. These strategies showed potential context specific benefits, particularly when caffeine was combined with warm up music or conditioning activity, but they did not establish a general advantage over isolated caffeine supplementation. For caffeine supplementation alone, favorable findings were reported for selected simulated combat outcomes, Special Judo Fitness Test performance, strength, power, muscular endurance, reaction related outcomes, and repeated high intensity activity. However, null findings were also common, even within commonly used doses of 3 to 6 mg/kg. Perceived exertion and heart rate were generally unchanged, whereas blood lactate more frequently increased following caffeine ingestion. Conclusions: Acute caffeine supplementation may improve selected performance outcomes in combat sport athletes, but responses vary across disciplines, tasks, athlete characteristics, dosing strategies, delivery forms, and competition formats. Doses of 3 to 6 mg/kg remain the most frequently studied protocols, but individual responses should be assessed during training before competition. Evidence for high or repeated doses, rapid delivery forms, and combined strategies remains preliminary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.