Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787648›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Incidental Detection of a Right-to-Left Atrial Shunt Without Pulmonary Hypertension.

Shiv Malhotra, Calista Kee, Leeza Peerzada, William M Strub

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiv MalhotraRadiology, CUNY School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Calista KeeRadiology, CUNY School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Leeza PeerzadaRadiology, CUNY School of Medicine, New York, USA.
William M StrubRadiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Right-to-left interatrial shunting permits venous blood to bypass the pulmonary circulation and enter the systemic circulation, potentially contributing to hypoxemia and paradoxical embolization. Although sustained right-to-left shunting is commonly associated with elevated right-sided or pulmonary arterial pressures, it may also occur in patients with normal pulmonary pressures because of transient pressure gradients or preferential flow across an interatrial communication. We present a 57-year-old man without known cardiac or pulmonary disease who developed progressive exertional dyspnea. Because his D-dimer result did not exclude pulmonary embolism, planar ventilation/perfusion imaging was performed following intravenous administration of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin. Pulmonary perfusion was normal without any segmental defects; however, unexpected radiotracer uptake was identified in the brain and kidneys. This raised suspicion for a right-to-left shunt. CT pulmonary angiography subsequently demonstrated contrast passage from the right atrium to the left atrium. Transthoracic echocardiography with a bubble study confirmed a large right-to-left shunt at the atrial level, with normal right ventricular size and thickness, an estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 15 mmHg, and an estimated right atrial pressure of 8 mmHg. The patient was referred for cardiology follow-up. This case demonstrates that systemic uptake of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin during lung perfusion imaging should prompt evaluation for right-to-left shunting, even in the absence of pulmonary hypertension.

Indexed as

dyspneahemodynamicsincidental findingintracardiac shuntright-to-left shunting

Identifiers

PMID42787648
PMCPMC13602833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.