ArticleAEM education and training2026
Using an Automated Evaluation System to Improve Medical Student Evaluation Response Rate and Reduce Administrative Burden.
Article in AEM education and training, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Email reminders facilitate timely task completion but can create substantial administrative burdens for clerkship staff. In our emergency medicine (EM) clerkship, third-year medical students initiate digital evaluation requests after each clinical shift, requiring frequent manual reminders to maintain completion rates. The time-intensive nature of this process highlights the need for a more efficient and scalable approach. Methods: This multi-site, pre-post study evaluated clinical performance evaluation completion rates and time to completion during the required EM clerkship over 48 weeks before and after implementation of an automated reminder system in September 2024. The system integrated existing survey functionality with Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power Automate to track evaluation requests and completion and generate reminders every 2 days for up to 28 days. Primary outcomes were evaluation completion rate and time to completion. A theoretical cost analysis compared estimated personnel costs of the manual reminder process, based on administrator time and median salary estimates, with projected programming development and maintenance costs over 3 years. Results: A total of 5747 evaluations were sent during this period to attending and resident evaluators. Overall completion rate rose modestly post-intervention (71.4% to 75.1%, Conclusions: Automated reminders improved evaluation completion but did not improve timeliness of completion, which may not translate into meaningful formative benefits if feedback is delayed. Further studies should focus on the impact on cognitive burden and evaluation quality before large-scale automated systems can be optimized and sustainably integrated into medical education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.