ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2026
Advancements in CRISPR-based
Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia is an X-linked hereditary bleeding disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding coagulation factors, leading to excessive bleeding and potentially being life-threatening. Currently, regular treatment for hemophilia is the infusion of recombinant blood coagulation factors. This approach is not only costly but can also give rise to complications such as the development of neutralizing antibodies (Nabs), which impede the therapeutic outcome. Hemophilia is a monogenic disease, making gene therapy a promising curative measure that includes gene addition and gene editing approaches. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have gained massive attention as the premier delivery vehicle for clinical gene therapy due to their diverse tissue tropisms dictated by the natural and engineered AAV capsids, their excellent safety profile since AAVs do not cause any known human diseases, low immunogenicity, and long-lasting gene expression. Several AAV-based gene addition therapies have been approved for hemophilia B and hemophilia A, and dozens of similar AAV-based clinical trials are underway. Gene editing technologies, like Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), have shown immense potential in the treatment of genetic diseases. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene integration provides critical advantages over regular gene insertion therapy by enabling site-specific, targeted genomic integration rather than random integration. Clinical trials focusing on AAV-CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in of human genes represent the frontier of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.