Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787626›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2026

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) as neurosurgical approaches in psychiatry: A systematic review of current clinical evidence.

Alberto Cervantes-Hernández, Ailyn Montúfar Medrano, Humberto Nicolini, Fabián César Piedimonte, Rosalia Zerón-Martínez, Fiacro Jimenez-Ponce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto Cervantes-HernándezFacultad Mexicana de Medicina, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ailyn Montúfar MedranoFacultad Mexicana de Medicina, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City, Mexico.
Humberto NicoliniCentro de Neurociencias, Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fabián César PiedimonteFundación CENIT, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rosalia Zerón-MartínezCentro de Neurociencias, Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fiacro Jimenez-PonceCentro de Neurociencias, Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS), including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), has emerged as an incisionless approach for modulating or ablating brain circuits implicated in psychiatric disorders. This systematic review summarizes the current clinical evidence on HIFU and LIFU for psychiatric indications, with emphasis on clinical outcomes, safety, targets, and methodological limitations. However, HIFU has primarily been investigated for incisionless ablative procedures, whereas LIFU has mainly been explored as a reversible neuromodulation technique. Given these distinct therapeutic objectives, direct comparison between both modalities should be interpreted cautiously. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane for studies published between 2014 and 2025 evaluating HIFU and LIFU in adults with psychiatric or neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical trials, pilot studies, open-label studies, and sham-controlled studies reporting clinical outcomes, stimulation or ablation targets, and adverse events were included. Studies involving nonpsychiatric indications, animal models, reviews, editorials, protocols, or other neuromodulation techniques that did not use focused ultrasound as the primary intervention were excluded. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three HIFU and five LIFU studies. HIFU studies primarily evaluated magnetic resonance-guided bilateral capsulotomy targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule in treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder. LIFU studies evaluated nonablative neuromodulation of fronto-limbic targets in mood, anxiety, trauma-related, and psychotic disorders. Across studies, focused ultrasound was associated with improvements in several psychiatric rating scales. Reported adverse effects were generally mild and transient, most commonly headache, dizziness, scalp sensitivity, or procedure-related discomfort. However, evidence was limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous diagnoses, variable follow-up, and risk of bias. Conclusions: Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that HIFU and LIFU may be associated with symptom improvement in selected psychiatric populations. Larger randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter trials are required to define efficacy, safety, optimal targets, and clinical implementation.

Indexed as

High-intensity focused ultrasoundLow-intensity focused ultrasoundNeuromodulationNeuropsychiatric disordersTranscranial focused ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42787626
PMCPMC13602696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.