Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787618›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Rebuilding health and human services: a call to strategic planning and action.

Sean Bruna, Adam Sarvana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sean BrunaDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, MSC 912, 167 Ashley Ave, Ste 301, Charleston, SC 29425-9120, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-6258
Adam SarvanaOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 20201, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been substantially reduced since early 2025. This has included staffing cuts on a scale not seen in decades, delays in implementing billions of dollars in grants, and other disruptions to normal operations, all of which have received considerable public coverage and attention. To date, far less public attention has been given to rebuilding efforts. This commentary presents recommendations for rebuilding HHS' lost capacity, following a series of roundtable discussions convened by a network of former senior HHS appointees. The roundtables included former HHS political appointees, career program staff and division leaders, and health policy researchers from universities, think tanks, and policy organizations. Based on common themes in these discussions, we propose 5 recommendations to rebuild HHS capacity: (1) treating and funding the rebuilding of federal health and health research capacity as an urgent national security priority; (2) shifting from reactive crisis management to coordinated forward planning; (3) continued documentation of what capacity has been lost and why; (4) establishing an independent, nonpartisan science advisory body across HHS; and (5) drafting legislation now so that policy windows are not missed when they open.

Indexed as

federal health policyhealth and human serviceshealth governancehealth workforcepresidential transitionpublic health infrastructurescientific integrity

Identifiers

PMID42787618
PMCPMC13602421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.