ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Harnessing tumor immune checkpoints for autoimmune disease therapeutics.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint (IC) pathways, originally identified in T-cell exhaustion in cancer, are increasingly recognized as key modulators of immune tolerance in autoimmune diseases (ADs). In ADs, these molecules function more accurately as inhibitory receptors (IRs) that fine-tune, rather than inducing classical exhaustion phenotypes, autoreactive immune cells. Unlike oncology, where checkpoint blockade enhances immunity, AD therapy aims to restore tolerance through IC agonism or immune reset approaches (e.g., CAR-T cells). This review synthesizes recent advances in targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT. Clinical success with CTLA-4-Ig (abatacept) and emerging efficacy of PD-1 agonists (e.g., peresolimab) provide proof-of-concept that augmenting inhibitory signaling can ameliorate autoimmunity. However, outcomes remain context-dependent, reflecting interplay between effector and regulatory subsets and tissue-specific environments. Mechanistic challenges, including multivalent receptor engagement, ligand complexity, and signaling heterogeneity (e.g., ITIM/ITSM phosphorylation), limit current approaches. Insights from immune-related adverse events (irAEs) highlight shared pathways of dysregulation and inform risk-benefit considerations. A major translational gap persists between acute transplant models and chronic autoimmunity, and validated predictive biomarkers are lacking. Beyond T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, and innate populations expand therapeutic opportunities. Future progress will require multi-omics profiling, biomarker-driven stratification, and next-generation agonist design. IC-targeted strategies hold promises but demand context-aware, mechanistically informed development for broad clinical impact in ADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.