Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787510›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2026

Preliminary Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Ukrainian Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).

Maria Luisa F Rispa Hoyos, Lieke C J Nijborg, Iryna Norkina, Paul A Boelen, Lonneke I M Lenferink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Luisa F Rispa HoyosDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-6822
Lieke C J NijborgDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8425-2693
Iryna NorkinaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-9836
Paul A BoelenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4125-4739
Lonneke I M LenferinkDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1329-6413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) was included in the DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. The Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Plus (TGI-SR+) is a self-report measure to assess PGD symptoms in accordance with both classification systems. It has been translated into various languages and validated across different contexts. Objective: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Ukrainian TGI-SR+. Method: Participants were Ukrainian adults who had lost a loved one at least 6 months ago. One hundred ninety-eight participants completed the TGI-SR+ and measures assessing posttraumatic stress and depression. We examined the factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and known-groups validity of the TGI-SR+. Moreover, rates of probable PGD caseness were calculated, and provisional cut-off scores were determined based on Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses. Results: The one-factor model showed an acceptable fit for DSM-5-TR, but not for ICD-11 PGD symptoms. While some of the factor loadings were low for both criteria sets, the items demonstrated good internal consistency. Convergent validity was supported by strong associations between symptom levels of DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD and posttraumatic stress and depression severity scores. Known-groups validity was partially supported by DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD severity being related to both cause of death and kinship to the deceased. The provisional cut-off score for detecting both probable DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD caseness, when summing all TGI-SR + items, was ≥ 75. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Ukrainian TGI-SR+ were mixed. However, pending further research in different and larger samples of Ukrainian bereaved people, this instrument can be used to assess PGD severity in Ukrainians.

Indexed as

assessmentbereavementgrieflossRussian invasionwar

Identifiers

PMID42787510
PMCPMC13602186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.