ArticleOphthalmology science2026
A 48-Month, Prospective, Multicenter, Natural History Study of Choroideremia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02994368 (A Multicenter Prospective Observational "Natural History" Study in Patients With Choroideremia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Prospective Observational "Natural History" Study in Patients With Choroideremia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: State-of-the-art testing modalities evaluated choroideremia (CHM) disease progression and examined the feasibility of measuring specific endpoints over time. Design: Prospective multicenter natural history study. Participants: Male participants (N = 57) were ≥14 years (range, 14-70 years) with a clinical diagnosis of CHM and a disease-causing variant in the Methods: Participants at 5 centers in the United States and Canada consented to testing at 6-month intervals for 24 months. Participants who completed the trial (NCT02994368) at the month 24 visit were asked to participate in visits at months 30, 36, 42, and 48. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity, static and kinetic visual fields, preserved fundus autofluorescence (PFAF), EZ width on SD-OCT, and Visual Function Questionnaire 25. Results: The estimated annual rate of decrease of BCVA in the right eye (OD) was 0.17 letters ( Conclusions: Preserved fundus autofluorescence area has an advantage over EZ area as a clinical endpoint in CHM due to its ease and precision of measurement. Importantly, several functional measures of visual field correlated highly with PFAF area, supporting its validity as an outcome measure. The average annual decrease in PFAF area was ∼10%. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.