ReviewEnvironmental research. Food systems2026
Enhancing youth resilience to agri-food system shocks: a pathway to climate justice.
Review in Environmental research. Food systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meaningful youth engagement in climate policy, resilience-building, and agrifood system transformation is vital to ensuring that young people are prioritised in national and global agendas. This review situates youth resilience within the context of climate justice, recognising that those in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) disproportionately experience climate-related shocks due to systemic inequalities. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses Protocol framework, a scoping review was undertaken to examine how youth in LMICs experience and respond to agrifood system vulnerabilities arising from climate change, economic disruptions (including COVID-19), and conflict, with a focus on education and employment outcomes. Systems thinking served as the central analytical approach to identify interdependencies, feedback loops, leverage points, and resilience pathways. The findings reveal limited research quantifying youth-specific vulnerabilities and resilience strategies within agrifood systems. While broad impacts are recognised, youth agency and adaptive capacities remain underexplored. The interactions among climate impacts, contextual vulnerability, health-productivity constraints, food insecurity and governance conditions create compounding risks that exacerbate food insecurity and social inequity among rural and urban youth. To address these gaps, the study proposes a conceptual framework that integrates climate justice principles into resilience-building strategies, promoting equitable access to resources, inclusive governance, and youth-led adaptation. By mapping interconnections across agrifood systems, climate, equity, education, and employment, the study charts resilience pathways toward socially inclusive, climate-adaptive, and economically sustainable food systems, underscoring the need for policies and research that centre youth agency and lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.