ArticleCureus2026
Effect of Rhythmic Stabilization Technique Versus Conventional Strengthening on Joint Stability, Pain, and Walking Performance in Chronic Ankle Instability.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) is one of the consequences of repeated sprains of the lateral aspect of an ankle joint, characterized by frequent episodes of the ankle giving way, pain, impaired proprioception, and reduced functional performance. In rehabilitation, traditional strengthening exercises are often performed; however, interventions targeting neuromuscular control and dynamic joint stabilization may provide superior outcomes. Rhythmic stabilization technique (RST), a proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique, promotes co-contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles, thereby enhancing joint stability and proprioceptive function.
methodsA total of 58 participants aged 18-40 years with a diagnosis of CAI were recruited for this comparative experimental study. Two groups were formed, and participants were randomly assigned to either group: Group A (RST, n = 29) and Group B (conventional strengthening, n = 29). Both groups underwent a structured four-week intervention program. Outcome measures included the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) for joint stability, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain intensity, and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for walking performance. Assessments were performed pre- and postintervention. Statistical analysis was performed.
resultsSignificant improvement was shown by both groups in all outcome measures following the intervention. Group A showed greater improvement in CAIT scores (16.79 ± 2.47 to 28.10 ± 1.21), NPRS scores (7.66 ± 0.81 to 1.66 ± 0.55), and FAAM scores (45.41 ± 3.52 to 74.28 ± 3.76) compared with Group B. Statistically significant differences were observed after the intervention favoring Group A across all outcomes (p < 0.0001).
conclusionRST demonstrated superior effectiveness and is considered a valuable evidence-based intervention for the rehabilitation of CAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.