ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Effect of closed reduction and external fixation in elderly patients with anterior shoulder dislocation combined with humeral surgical neck fracture: a retrospective cohort study based on fracture-dislocation classification.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior shoulder dislocation combined with humeral surgical neck fracture is a severe injury that often requires emergency surgery. However, for some patients, such as those of advanced age or with surgical contraindications, closed reduction can be considered. This retrospective cohort study aimed to confirm the feasibility and clinical outcomes of the closed reduction technique with effective external fixation for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation combined with humeral surgical neck fracture in elderly patients. Method: From January 2010 to March 2024, a total of 51 patients with anterior shoulder dislocation combined with humeral surgical neck fracture from Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine participated in this study. All patients underwent emergency closed reduction and external fixation. Whether they would be finally included in the statistical analysis was determined based on the post-reduction imaging results. We conducted follow-up for more than one year on the patients who were finally included in the study. We also recorded patients' general characteristics, fracture-dislocation classification (type I, type II, type III), fracture reduction and healing status, as well as the affected limb's function scores. Result: After screening, 38 patients were included in the cohort, and ultimately 34 patients completed the follow-up. Among them, there were 11 males and 23 females. Their ages ranged from 65 to 90 years, with an average of (74.15 ± 7.36) years. All 34 patients comprised 15 cases of type I, 14 cases of type II, and 5 cases of type III, respectively. Notably, 64.71% (22/34) of them achieved successful closed reduction, including 13 cases of type I, 9 cases of type II, and no case of type III. At the last follow-up, 8.82% (3/34) and 5.88% (2/34) of patients experienced humeral head ischemic necrosis and nonunion of fractures, respectively. The Constant Murley shoulder function score for conservative treatment patients ( Conclusion: Emergency closed reduction is feasible for anterior shoulder dislocation combined with humeral surgical neck fracture. Therefore, closed reduction and external fixation should be considered as an optional approach, mainly applicable to elderly patients with reducible Type I or Type II fracture-dislocation classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.