ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Molecular subgroups and biomarker guided precision immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: advances, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive, biologically heterogeneous subtype with limited targeted therapies. Immunotherapy improves outcomes in selected patients, but durable benefit is limited by inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, imperfect biomarkers, and primary or acquired resistance. This review integrates evidence from major positive and negative trials, molecular subgroup studies, predictive biomarkers, and tumor immune microenvironment research to assess current standards and unresolved challenges. Immune checkpoint blockade plus chemotherapy is now standard for high-risk early-stage TNBC and PD-L1-positive metastatic disease, although benefit varies by disease setting, assay, and immune phenotype. Biomarkers such as PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes provide useful but incomplete guidance because of methodological differences, spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and treatment-induced changes. The central clinical challenge is to identify which patients require intensified immune-based combinations and which are unlikely to benefit from checkpoint blockade alone. We propose a precision immunotherapy framework that integrates TNBC molecular subgroups, validated and dynamic biomarker models, rational combinations, resistance mechanisms, and emerging tools, including single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, multi-omics, and AI-assisted stratification. This strategy may improve response durability while reducing unnecessary toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.