Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787390›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2026

Multimodal AI in precision medicine: linking omics, imaging and clinical decisions.

Rong Wei, Qiping Zheng

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rong WeiThe Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Qiping ZhengThe Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine is shifting from a single-biomarker paradigm toward multimodal integration of molecular, imaging, and clinical data, with artificial intelligence (AI) serving as a key enabling technology. Multimodal imaging, computational pathology, spatial omics and liquid biopsy have all become more adept at capturing disease and biological variation, and foundation models, especially vision-language models, are now creating a common language between histology, molecular and biomedical text. AI-powered pipelines are also improving data quality upstream, which ultimately means that multimodal inference can be applied to tasks of real clinical importance: biomarker screening, modelling treatment outcomes, even autonomous coordination among diagnostic systems, rather than just retrospective prediction. But none of this means more modalities necessarily translate into more value. Additional data may introduce redundancy, technical artefacts, institutional bias, and missingness. The future of multimodal AI should therefore emphasize sufficiency rather than maximalism, with systems designed to accommodate incomplete or asynchronous inputs, quantify uncertainty, and demonstrate added value over established clinical standards. Ultimately, clinical utility will depend on external and prospective validation showing improvements in calibration, efficiency, net clinical benefit, and patient outcomes. The promise of AI-enabled multimodal precision medicine lies not in combining every available data stream, but in determining which molecular, morphological, and clinical information is necessary, complementary, and actionable for an individual patient at a specific decision point.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencemedical imagingmultimodal learningmulti-omicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42787390
PMCPMC13601836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.