ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2026
Multimodal AI in precision medicine: linking omics, imaging and clinical decisions.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine is shifting from a single-biomarker paradigm toward multimodal integration of molecular, imaging, and clinical data, with artificial intelligence (AI) serving as a key enabling technology. Multimodal imaging, computational pathology, spatial omics and liquid biopsy have all become more adept at capturing disease and biological variation, and foundation models, especially vision-language models, are now creating a common language between histology, molecular and biomedical text. AI-powered pipelines are also improving data quality upstream, which ultimately means that multimodal inference can be applied to tasks of real clinical importance: biomarker screening, modelling treatment outcomes, even autonomous coordination among diagnostic systems, rather than just retrospective prediction. But none of this means more modalities necessarily translate into more value. Additional data may introduce redundancy, technical artefacts, institutional bias, and missingness. The future of multimodal AI should therefore emphasize sufficiency rather than maximalism, with systems designed to accommodate incomplete or asynchronous inputs, quantify uncertainty, and demonstrate added value over established clinical standards. Ultimately, clinical utility will depend on external and prospective validation showing improvements in calibration, efficiency, net clinical benefit, and patient outcomes. The promise of AI-enabled multimodal precision medicine lies not in combining every available data stream, but in determining which molecular, morphological, and clinical information is necessary, complementary, and actionable for an individual patient at a specific decision point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.