ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Authoritarianism today-a revised measurement model.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In light of recent social developments, debates about the adequacy of Altemeyer's widely-used scale on "right-wing authoritarianism" have (re-)gained momentum, as a shift in the articulation and expression of authoritarianism could be observed. In the German-speaking realm, researchers argue for a reconsideration of the original conceptualization of authoritarianism, drawing on a developmental-psychological model and a social-theoretical basis in the tradition of Critical Theory. Making this debate accessible to an international readership, we propose a measurement model that conceptualizes authoritarianism as a third-order factor comprising two distinct authoritarian psychodynamics - Methods: After deriving these factors theoretically, we test the proposed model by means of confirmatory factor analysis on a German representative dataset (N = 2,466). Results: The proposed model fits the data very well (scaled CFI = 0.965, scaled RMSEA = 0.058, scaled SRMR = 0.044) with significant loadings throughout, though it cannot be statistically distinguished from two equivalent specifications and shows limited reliability at the higher-order level ( Discussion: By critically reconsidering the origins of authoritarianism and systematically operationalizing and testing our theoretical claims, the paper sheds light on the concept's evolving manifestations and contributes to a nuanced understanding of authoritarian tendencies amidst emerging societal changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.