Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787381›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Authoritarianism today-a revised measurement model.

Marius Dilling, Ayline Heller, Clara Schließler, Johannes Kiess, Elmar Brähler, Oliver Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marius Dilling *Else-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ayline Heller *GESIS, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.
Clara SchließlerElse-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes KiessElse-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Elmar BrählerElse-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Oliver DeckerElse-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In light of recent social developments, debates about the adequacy of Altemeyer's widely-used scale on "right-wing authoritarianism" have (re-)gained momentum, as a shift in the articulation and expression of authoritarianism could be observed. In the German-speaking realm, researchers argue for a reconsideration of the original conceptualization of authoritarianism, drawing on a developmental-psychological model and a social-theoretical basis in the tradition of Critical Theory. Making this debate accessible to an international readership, we propose a measurement model that conceptualizes authoritarianism as a third-order factor comprising two distinct authoritarian psychodynamics - Methods: After deriving these factors theoretically, we test the proposed model by means of confirmatory factor analysis on a German representative dataset (N = 2,466). Results: The proposed model fits the data very well (scaled CFI = 0.965, scaled RMSEA = 0.058, scaled SRMR = 0.044) with significant loadings throughout, though it cannot be statistically distinguished from two equivalent specifications and shows limited reliability at the higher-order level ( Discussion: By critically reconsidering the origins of authoritarianism and systematically operationalizing and testing our theoretical claims, the paper sheds light on the concept's evolving manifestations and contributes to a nuanced understanding of authoritarian tendencies amidst emerging societal changes.

Indexed as

authoritarianismconfirmatory factor analysisconspiracy mentalityconspiritualitycritical theoryGermanyromanticismsuperstition

Identifiers

PMID42787381
PMCPMC13601297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.