ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2026
Microbial species isolation and antimicrobial resistance patterns of burn wounds infections in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a focus of global interest in the treatment of wound infections. The growing antimicrobial resistance, particularly in burn wound infections, poses a serious challenge, highlighting the need to understand pathogen distribution and drug susceptibility patterns.
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the pathogens responsible for burn wound infections and determine their drug susceptibility pattern. This study was conducted from September 2018 to January 2020 and included 163 patients.
resultA total of 164 microorganisms were isolated from 129 burn wounds, yielding an isolation rate of 78.65%. A solitary agent was isolated in 80 (62.02%), whereas a mixed infection was detected in 49 (37.98%) patients. The most common microorganisms detected were Gram-negative bacteria (102 isolates, 62.19%), with
conclusionThe findings provide valuable insight into the prevalence of microorganisms in burn wounds and suggest that antibiotic resistance patterns can be useful in guiding the development of effective treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.