ArticlePlant and soil2026
Impact of power line corridors on carbon stocks of upland forests in eastern Canada.
Article in Plant and soil, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Hydroelectricity is considered a renewable energy source with low greenhouse gas emissions. However, little attention has been given to the impact of the construction and maintenance of power line corridors on soil and vegetation. This study assessed the effect of power line corridors on terrestrial carbon pools in upland forests across a 750-km gradient from deciduous forests to open-canopy taiga in Quebec (Canada). Methods: Quantification of ecosystem carbon pools (live biomass, dead organic matter and soil) was carried out using transects of plots located in: i) the power line corridor, ii) the forest located at 20 m from the corridor edge (forest edge), and iii) the forest located at 60 m from the corridor (interior forest, considered as a control). Results: Ecosystem carbon stocks were significantly lower in the corridors, with reductions of 36-133 Mg of C ha Conclusion: Our study improves the quantification of carbon storage across forested landscapes and the GHG footprint of hydroelectricity. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08978-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.