Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787321›Full record

ArticleTSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen2026

[Developing a heuristic Transformative Health Governance model from an evaluation of the Dutch All about Health program].

Marleen P M Bekker, Laurens M Reumers, Chantal Walg, Maria W J Jansen, Henk B M Hilderink, Jan-Kees Helderman, Dirk Ruwaard

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marleen P M BekkerLeerstoelgroep Gezondheid en Maatschappij, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Nederland.ORCID 0000-0002-7431-4374
Laurens M ReumersAfdeling Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Nederland.
Chantal WalgAnders Gezond, Arnhem, Nederland.
Maria W J JansenAfdeling Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Nederland.
Henk B M HilderinkRijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven, Nederland.
Jan-Kees HeldermanRadboud University, Institute for Management Research, Nijmegen, Nederland.
Dirk RuwaardAfdeling Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Nederland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: By evaluating the Dutch national program All about Health (AiG) for facilitating cross-domain societal health networks, we investigate the question 'How can societal health transformation be conceptualized and evaluated?' Using literature, progress in these networks has been interpreted as a chain of small wins resulting from situational, action-oriented, and transformational change mechanisms of contextual preconditions. Methods: Between 2014 and 2022, a multiple case study was conducted with four different initiative networks affiliated with AiG, involving a total of 53 semi-structured stakeholder interviews, fifteen observations of network meetings, training sessions, and local workshops, and validating insights in three dialogue workshops with pioneers and AiG staff. Results: Observations led to the formulation of five small wins and five change mechanisms that mutually reinforce each other in a non-linear way, driven by a national platform facilitated by the AiG program office. Conflict escalation and management are of essential importance for the adaptation or revision of norms, practices and underlying rules and responsibilities. These gains and mechanisms have been brought together in a heuristic Transformative Health Governance Model. Conclusion: Societal health transformation calls for a transition within policy systems towards demand-driven policy and a transformation towards shared responsibilities between policy systems as well as between the state, the market, and society. The THG model offers an evaluative framework and an action perspective to health transformation initiatives in society. More research is required to understand and achieve a translation of normative transformation into institutional transformation.

Indexed as

Change mechanismsCollective action for healthEvaluationSmall winsTransformation

Identifiers

PMID42787321
PMCPMC13601145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.