ArticleTSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen2026
[Developing a heuristic Transformative Health Governance model from an evaluation of the Dutch All about Health program].
Article in TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: By evaluating the Dutch national program All about Health (AiG) for facilitating cross-domain societal health networks, we investigate the question 'How can societal health transformation be conceptualized and evaluated?' Using literature, progress in these networks has been interpreted as a chain of small wins resulting from situational, action-oriented, and transformational change mechanisms of contextual preconditions. Methods: Between 2014 and 2022, a multiple case study was conducted with four different initiative networks affiliated with AiG, involving a total of 53 semi-structured stakeholder interviews, fifteen observations of network meetings, training sessions, and local workshops, and validating insights in three dialogue workshops with pioneers and AiG staff. Results: Observations led to the formulation of five small wins and five change mechanisms that mutually reinforce each other in a non-linear way, driven by a national platform facilitated by the AiG program office. Conflict escalation and management are of essential importance for the adaptation or revision of norms, practices and underlying rules and responsibilities. These gains and mechanisms have been brought together in a heuristic Transformative Health Governance Model. Conclusion: Societal health transformation calls for a transition within policy systems towards demand-driven policy and a transformation towards shared responsibilities between policy systems as well as between the state, the market, and society. The THG model offers an evaluative framework and an action perspective to health transformation initiatives in society. More research is required to understand and achieve a translation of normative transformation into institutional transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.