ArticleCureus2026
Boerhaave Syndrome: Challenges Faced to Achieve Positive Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Boerhaave syndrome, the spontaneous barogenic rupture of the oesophagus, is lethal when unrecognised and its cardiorespiratory mimicry frequently delays diagnosis. Optimal management remains debated. We retrospectively reviewed four consecutive patients with spontaneous oesophageal perforation managed over two years at a tertiary surgical-gastroenterology unit. Diagnosis was confirmed by water-soluble oral-contrast computed tomography; presentation, operative findings, complications and outcomes were analysed and compared with the contemporary literature. The four patients were initially assessed by non-surgical services, with an intercostal drain placed for a presumed effusion or pneumothorax before food or purulent fluid in the drain revealed the diagnosis. The perforation was left-sided in three and right-sided in one. Management was individualised: laparoscopy converted to laparotomy with transhiatal primary repair and omental buttress; laparotomy with transhiatal repair and thoracoscopic lavage; a thoraco-abdominal approach; and a right posterolateral thoracotomy. A postoperative leak occurred in two patients and was managed by endoscopic vacuum therapy and by transhiatal oesophagectomy with gastric conduit, respectively. All four patients survived. Food-stained or purulent output from a chest drain placed for a presumed effusion should prompt immediate contrast computed tomography. An individualised, multidisciplinary strategy combining timely source control, thoracoscopic pleural lavage and modern endoscopic rescue achieved survival in every patient, including a rare right-sided rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.