ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Perceived usability and psychological responses to augmented reality feedback in beginner golf: a mixed-methods pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Augmented reality (AR) is increasingly used in physical education, but little is known about learners' psychological responses to AR-assisted visual feedback in beginner golf instruction. Methods: This exploratory mixed-methods pilot study examined learner perceptions and preliminary pretest-posttest changes in learning motivation and perceived sources of self-efficacy. Twenty-four undergraduates completed an eight-week multicomponent AR-supported golf program, and six participated in semi-structured interviews. Learning motivation was assessed using ARCS dimensions, and perceived sources of self-efficacy using four Bandura-based dimensions. Results: Descriptively, overall learning motivation increased by 0.31 [95% CI (0.04, 0.59)], with Cohen's Discussion: These findings provide preliminary information about learner experiences during AR-supported golf instruction rather than evidence of effectiveness. The small sample, single-group design, multicomponent program, and absence of objective performance measures preclude causal conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.