ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Immune monitoring, immune phenotyping, and precision intervention in severe pneumonia: current evidence and translational challenges.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe pneumonia remains a major cause of mortality in critically ill patients, with severe community-acquired pneumonia representing a clinically important and representative scenario. This review focuses primarily on severe community-acquired pneumonia as the clinical context, in which outcomes are determined by the interplay between pathogen burden and heterogeneity of host responses. Beyond pathogen-directed therapies, severe pneumonia is frequently characterized by dynamic and partially overlapping states of hyperinflammation, immune dysfunction, and subsequent immunosuppression. Different host conditions, including immunocompromised states, advanced age, post-sepsis critical illness, and pediatric populations, further increase the complexity and heterogeneity of immune responses. These immune states can be evaluated through conventional inflammatory biomarkers, cellular immune parameters, cytokine profiling, and emerging high-dimensional profiling technologies. This review summarizes the immunopathological basis of severe pneumonia and presents an integrated translational framework encompassing immune monitoring, immune phenotype characterization, risk stratification, evidence-based intervention selection, and serial reassessment. Importantly, immune phenotypic classification should be distinguished from prognostic prediction: models capable of predicting mortality risk do not necessarily identify biologically meaningful immune phenotypes that are amenable to therapeutic intervention. Current evidence supports the use of immune biomarkers primarily as complementary tools for risk stratification and hypothesis-driven patient selection, whereas most immune-targeted interventions remain investigational. Future clinical implementation requires standardized assays, phenotype definitions that incorporate both pathogen characteristics and disease trajectory, external validation, and prospective clinical trials demonstrating improvements in clinically meaningful patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.