Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787262›Full record

ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases2026

Stepwise 900 µm to 1100 µm Microneedle Selection for Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide.

Victor Bellanda, Waseem Midlij, Danny A Mammo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor BellandaCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-5845
Waseem MidlijBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
Danny A MammoCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-5118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe real-world microneedle size use during suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injection and identify patient-level factors associated with 900 µm vs 1100 µm microneedle requirement. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of all eyes receiving suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide between November 2022 and May 2026 from a single provider at a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was microneedle size requirement (900 µm vs 1100 µm) at the first injection. The secondary outcome was needle size transition on repeat injections among eyes initially injected with the 900 µm needle. Generalized estimating equations with patient-level clustering were used for the primary analysis. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Results: A total of 103 eyes from 88 patients were included, comprising 202 injections. Using a standardized stepwise approach of attempting the 900 µm needle at first injection in all eyes, 64 eyes (62.1%) were successfully injected, while 39 eyes (37.9%) required the 1100 µm needle. On multivariable analysis, self-identified Black race was independently associated with requirement of a 1100 µm needle (adjusted odds ratio, 8.59, 95% CI, 2.42-30.48; Conclusions: A stepwise approach beginning with the 900 µm needle is safe and effective for most patients and may optimize suprachoroidal drug delivery across a diverse patient population. Self-identified Black race is strongly and independently associated with requirement of a 1100 µm microneedle for suprachoroidal injection, potentially reflecting ancestry-related differences in scleral and suprachoroidal anatomy.

Indexed as

drug deliverymicroneedle selectionracescleral thicknesssuprachoroidal injectiontriamcinolone acetonideuveitic macular edema

Identifiers

PMID42787262
PMCPMC13601376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.