Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787149›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Toward an integrative psychological framework of existential hope: navigating uncertain futures.

Ernst Bohlmeijer, Marlon Nieuwenhuis, Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez, Peter Ten Klooster, Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ernst BohlmeijerDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Marlon NieuwenhuisDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Alejandro Rodriguez DominguezDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Peter Ten KloosterDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Catherine Malboeuf-HurtubiseSchool of Psychology, Universite Laval Ecole de Psychologie, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current positive psychological theories conceptualize hope primarily as a cognitive-motivational process, involving beliefs about one's capacity to generate pathways to desired goals and the perceived agency to pursue them. Such models implicitly rely on a temporality characterized by predictability and control. However, this assumption is not valid for contexts of radical uncertainty in which the future cannot be meaningfully anticipated or is perceived as threatening. This paper articulates an innovative, integrative framework of existential hope informed by a narrative review of the literature that draws on existential, cognitive, and behavioral perspectives. Existential hope is defined as a foundational psychological stance toward life and the future, grounded in existential trust, sustained by a sense of meaning, and expressed through agency - the commitment to act in ways that improve life - even under conditions of uncertainty and perceived threat. In the proposed framework, hope is existential when it is sustained by a belief in the possibility of a good life in the future, even when current developments appear to undermine or contradict such a future. As such, this paper first delineates three core components of existential hope: existential trust, meaning, and agency. It then describes the psychological processes through which individuals may transform experiences of radical uncertainty or existential threat into existential hope, including embracing uncertainty, articulating values, futuring, and relational orienting. Next, the paper discusses how the cultivation of existential hope may contribute to beneficial outcomes, such as increased well-being and civic engagement, alongside reductions in psychological distress. Finally, several pathways for future empirical research are outlined.

Indexed as

agencyexistential hopeexistential trustframeworkmeaninguncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42787149
PMCPMC13600848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.