ArticleTSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen2026
Article in TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This article aims at an exploratory validation of a Transformative Health Governance (THG) model. This model stems from a literature review and observations in four diverse case studies, consisting of cross-domain health networks affiliated with the program Alles is Gezondheid (AiG; see the article 'De ontwikkeling van een heuristisch Maatschappelijk GezondheidsTransformatie-model op basis van een evaluatie van het programma Alles is Gezondheid' in this special). In this article, we test the model among a broader representation of partners and users of AiG. Methods: In April 2022, an online survey was conducted among partners and users of the AiG platform and services. A total of 103 questionnaires were analysed to explore the relevance of this model for follow-up research and for practice. Results: We find strong associations between mechanisms and small wins, indicating mutual reinforcement of building conditions for health transformation. Support from a facilitating platform such as the AiG program office appears to promote awareness of a broader health concept and the adoption of innovations in daily working routines. Conclusion: The THG model offers a cautious indication of actual transformative processes in the context of AiG. The THG model requires validation in other contexts to test generalizability and its suitability for evaluative research. For practice, the THG model provides direction for the coordination and evaluation of initiative networks for transformative health governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.