ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Different DNA input amounts and library preparation kits yield comparable resistome characterization using target-enriched metagenomic sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Target-enriched metagenomic sequencing improves detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) relative to standard shotgun metagenomics, but whether DNA input amount influences resistome characterization has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We evaluated target-enriched sequencing using fecal microbial communities from multiple host species and compared results across library preparation kits, DNA input amounts, and sequencing approaches. Composite fecal samples from livestock and humans and individual canine samples were processed using three library preparation kits and DNA input amounts ranging from 50 to 800 ng. Results: Target-enriched libraries from composite samples were compared with shotgun metagenomic sequences generated from the same samples. Target-enriched sequencing achieved a 7.9-fold increase in on-target read proportions and detected 12-fold more unique antimicrobial resistance gene groups than shotgun metagenomics. Resistome composition was driven primarily by sample source, which explained 66%-79% of within-species variance, while library preparation kit accounted for 13%-26% and DNA input amount had no consistent effect. Kit-associated differences were systematic and affected primarily low-abundance resistance classes but were small relative to biological variation among samples. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that target-enriched metagenomic sequencing substantially improves resistome detection and provides comparable resistome characterization DNA input amounts ranging from 50 to 800 ng. Differences associated with library preparation were small relative to biological variation, supporting the flexibility of using differing DNA inputs for resistome characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.