ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Hidden Metachronous Invasive Rectal Cancer after Repeated Endoscopic Treatment Following Ileorectal Anastomosis for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who undergo colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) are at risk of adenoma recurrence and malignant transformation in the residual rectum. Advances in endoscopic techniques have enabled intensive surveillance with aggressive polypectomy to reduce the short-term risk of malignant progression. However, long-term management often requires a balance between endoscopic management and timely surgical intervention, and evidence to guide this balance remains limited. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old woman with FAP underwent total colectomy with IRA. During surveillance, an intramucosal rectal adenocarcinoma was detected at 65 years of age and resected transanally. Despite regular endoscopic treatment of recurrent lesions using endoscopic mucosal resection and argon plasma coagulation, the patient developed anal pain at 73 years of age. Imaging revealed a fluid collection suggestive of a posterior rectal wall abscess. Abdominoperineal resection was performed, and histopathological examination revealed invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma, leading to a diagnosis of metachronous rectal cancer. The patient has remained recurrence-free for 12 years postoperatively.
conclusionsThis case highlights the limitations of long-term endoscopic therapy in patients with FAP following IRA. Repeated interventions may have contributed to chronic inflammation and mucosal alterations, which might have impaired visualization and complicated the detection of invasive carcinoma. Clinicians should avoid relying solely on endoscopic management and should regularly reassess the need for timely surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.