ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
When parasocial relationships meet food technology neophobia: understanding consumer responses to virtual influencer marketing of upcycled foods.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines how virtual influencers' social attractiveness, perceived authenticity, and self-disclosure are associated with consumers' purchase intention toward upcycled foods. It further investigates parasocial relationships as a mediating mechanism and food technology neophobia as a boundary condition that may constrain the translation of relational closeness into purchase intention. Methods: Data were collected through a questionnaire survey, yielding 443 valid responses. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships, bias-corrected bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples was employed to assess the mediating effects, and interaction-term and simple slope analyses were conducted to examine the moderating role of food technology neophobia. Results: Social attractiveness, perceived authenticity, and self-disclosure were all positively associated with parasocial relationships, which, in turn, were positively associated with purchase intention toward upcycled foods. Parasocial relationships partially mediated the associations between all three virtual influencer characteristics and purchase intention. Food technology neophobia significantly weakened the positive association between parasocial relationships and purchase intention. Conclusion: The findings indicate that consumer responses to upcycled foods recommended by virtual influencers reflect both relationship-building processes and technology-related concerns. Social attractiveness, perceived authenticity, and self-disclosure provide complementary relational cues that support parasocial relationship formation, while food technology neophobia limits the extent to which this psychological closeness translates into purchase intention. Firms marketing upcycled foods through virtual influencers should combine coherent persona management and sustained relationship building with transparent communication about ingredient origins, processing procedures, product safety, and nutritional quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.