ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Narrative Review from Clinical Recognition to Risk-Adapted Cancer Prevention.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is a clinically defined colorectal polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple and/or large serrated lesions and an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Its diagnosis remains challenging because it depends on cumulative endoscopic and histopathological findings rather than a single germline marker, and it remains under-recognized in routine practice. The biological basis of SPS is heterogeneous: serrated tumorigenesis commonly involves BRAF or KRAS activation, CpG island methylation, and MLH1 silencing, yet most cases are not explained by classic Mendelian inheritance and SPS-associated CRC may arise through serrated or conventional adenoma-carcinoma pathways. This narrative review integrates current evidence on clinical recognition, WHO diagnostic criteria, cancer risk, biological heterogeneity, endoscopic clearance, surveillance, surgery, and family screening. After high-quality clearance, surveillance can be adapted dynamically using the most recent clinical, endoscopic, and pathological findings, including polyp burden, advanced serrated lesions, dysplasia, advanced adenomas, prior CRC, and completeness of resection. At present, these conventional variables and guideline-based intervals constitute current practice; germline, epigenetic, microbiome, metabolomic, and other non-invasive biomarkers remain investigational and should not determine routine surveillance. A phase-based approach combining cumulative diagnosis, effective clearance, risk-adapted 1- or 2-year surveillance, selective surgery, and screening of first-degree relatives provides a pragmatic framework for CRC prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.