ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Belgian Physicians' Perceptions of Sexual Health and Its Care in Cervical Cancer Survivors: An Exploratory Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Main Objective of the Study: To (1) identify Belgian physicians' perceptions of sexual health discussions with patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC), and (2) describe sexual health care provision from the physicians' perspective. Methods: This study was part of a larger exploratory qualitative study using semistructured one-on-one interviews. The present manuscript focuses on 16 Belgian physicians specialized in pelvic gynecologic oncology. Recruitment took place in five hospitals between September 2021 and January 2022. Participants had a median age of 45 years, 56% were female, half were gynecologists, and they provided follow-up care for a mean of 18 newly diagnosed CC patients annually. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic data analysis. COREQ and SRQR reporting guidelines were applied. Results: Three main themes emerged from the interviews. First, physicians reported substantial variability in when they initiate discussions about sexual health in CC care. This variability was shaped by a complex interplay of factors that could either prompt or dampen such conversations. Second, many physicians adopted a predominantly medical approach to sexual health concerns, while non-medical - psychosocial - aspects of sexual health were largely overlooked. Third, physicians identified several strategies to improve care. An interprofessional approach, with specialized roles for the oncology nurse and sexologist, was perceived as highly valuable. Participants emphasized the need for a structured sexual health care pathway as key overarching proposal. Conclusion: This study underscores a persistent gap between physicians' intention to address sexual health and their actual communication practices. Implicit triage, role ambiguity, and structural constraints contribute to inconsistent and reactive discussions. Physicians suggested that strengthening interprofessional collaboration - through the integration of oncology nurses and sexologists - together with the implementation of an oncologic sexual health care pathway, could enhance awareness, reduce physician-driven variability, and improve overall sexual health care for women with CC. They also advocated routine sexologist consultations at defined points throughout the disease trajectory and emphasized the importance of involving partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.