Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787058›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Belgian Physicians' Perceptions of Sexual Health and Its Care in Cervical Cancer Survivors: An Exploratory Qualitative Interview Study.

Eline Naert, Lise-Marie Kinnaer, Emiel A De Jaeghere, Marjolein R P Orije, Hans Verstraelen, Philippe Tummers, Katrien Vandecasteele, Hannelore G Denys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eline NaertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1508-7263
Lise-Marie KinnaerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Emiel A De JaeghereDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marjolein R P OrijeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Hans VerstraelenDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Philippe TummersCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Katrien VandecasteeleCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Hannelore G DenysDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Main Objective of the Study: To (1) identify Belgian physicians' perceptions of sexual health discussions with patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC), and (2) describe sexual health care provision from the physicians' perspective. Methods: This study was part of a larger exploratory qualitative study using semistructured one-on-one interviews. The present manuscript focuses on 16 Belgian physicians specialized in pelvic gynecologic oncology. Recruitment took place in five hospitals between September 2021 and January 2022. Participants had a median age of 45 years, 56% were female, half were gynecologists, and they provided follow-up care for a mean of 18 newly diagnosed CC patients annually. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic data analysis. COREQ and SRQR reporting guidelines were applied. Results: Three main themes emerged from the interviews. First, physicians reported substantial variability in when they initiate discussions about sexual health in CC care. This variability was shaped by a complex interplay of factors that could either prompt or dampen such conversations. Second, many physicians adopted a predominantly medical approach to sexual health concerns, while non-medical - psychosocial - aspects of sexual health were largely overlooked. Third, physicians identified several strategies to improve care. An interprofessional approach, with specialized roles for the oncology nurse and sexologist, was perceived as highly valuable. Participants emphasized the need for a structured sexual health care pathway as key overarching proposal. Conclusion: This study underscores a persistent gap between physicians' intention to address sexual health and their actual communication practices. Implicit triage, role ambiguity, and structural constraints contribute to inconsistent and reactive discussions. Physicians suggested that strengthening interprofessional collaboration - through the integration of oncology nurses and sexologists - together with the implementation of an oncologic sexual health care pathway, could enhance awareness, reduce physician-driven variability, and improve overall sexual health care for women with CC. They also advocated routine sexologist consultations at defined points throughout the disease trajectory and emphasized the importance of involving partners.

Indexed as

cervical cancercommunicationqualitative researchsexual healthsexual health care

Identifiers

PMID42787058
PMCPMC13600977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.