Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787049›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Toward an integrated animal-human nutrition intelligence via agentic retrieval-augmented language models.

Luis O Tedeschi, Nicole Greer, Karun Kaniyamattam, Dheeraj Mudireddy, Robert Strong, Praneet Sai Madhu Surabhi, Jian Tao, Ashley Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Nicole GreerDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Karun KaniyamattamDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Dheeraj MudireddyDepartment of Computer Science, Texas A&M Institute of Data Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Robert StrongDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Praneet Sai Madhu SurabhiDepartment of Computer Science, Texas A&M Institute of Data Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Jian TaoCollege of Performance, Visualization & Fine Arts, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Texas A&M Institute of Data Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Ashley WangSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-source foods are nutritionally "plastic," with fatty acid profiles, vitamins, and minerals that can be altered by animal diets and management. Although the literature documenting these effects is extensive, it is fragmented across disciplines and experimental contexts, limiting translation into actionable guidance for food quality and human nutrition. We developed the Intelligent System for Integrating Global Human & Animal Health Technology (INSIGHT), a domain-specialized retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system designed to synthesize evidence across animal production and human nutrition research with explicit provenance. INSIGHT employs a nine-stage RAG pipeline that integrates query expansion, hybrid retrieval, evidence reranking, and self-verification to deliver transparent, citation-linked responses. Throughout, retrieval refers to document selection, integration to the combination of retrieved evidence into a coherent evidence set, and synthesis to the LLM-based generation of grounded narrative responses. The knowledge base comprises ~4,000 peer-reviewed papers in animal science, feed composition, and human dietary research. To evaluate retrieval performance across diverse literature contexts, we developed a multi-group evaluation framework: 282 documents were randomly selected and organized into 26 semantically coherent groups of ~10 papers each. For each group, Perplexity Deep Research generated 25 question-answer pairs and identified ground-truth relevant documents. Each question was posed to INSIGHT, yielding document-level precision, recall, and F1-score metrics across 614 total queries. Generalized linear mixed models with beta regression revealed significant between-group performance variation (

Indexed as

animal nutritionanimal-source foodsdecision support systemsevidence-grounded synthesishuman nutritionlarge language modelsliterature synthesisretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID42787049
PMCPMC13600821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.