SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Survival disparities in HER2-low versus HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review of progression-free survival and overall survival.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emergence of HER2-low breast cancer as a distinct clinical entity has challenged the traditional binary classification of HER2 status. This systematic review aims to evaluate the disparities in Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) between HER2-low and HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Methods: A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ESMO and ASCO for studies published through January 2026. The Clinical trials and observational studies reporting Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) with Hazard Ratios (HR) were included. Due to significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a formal meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate; consequently, evidence was synthesized qualitatively following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261293004). Results: A total of 536 records were identified; after removing 356 duplicates, 180 were screened, and 10 trials met the inclusion criteria. Preliminary synthesis indicates that HER2-low tumors exhibit distinct survival trajectories compared to HER2-positive cohorts, often influenced by Hormone Receptor (HR) co-expression and the type of targeted therapy received. Conclusion: Understanding survival disparities is crucial for optimizing treatment sequencing in the era of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261293004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.