ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Metagenomic Sequencing in the Early Post-Lung Transplantation Period: A Pilot Comparison with Microbiologic Culture.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture has limited sensitivity in lung transplant recipients due to universal antimicrobial prophylaxis and inability to detect non-culturable organisms. We prospectively enrolled 19 adult lung transplant recipients undergoing serial bronchoscopies during the immediate post-transplant period. BAL samples (N=33) were tested in parallel with conventional culture, microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing with quantitative analysis, and long-read sequencing, using a unified three-tier organism classification framework. BAL host-response biomarkers were profiled concurrently. mcfDNA sequencing detected pathogens in 19 of 33 episodes (58%) versus 8 of 33 by conventional culture (24%); organism-level concordance was low (Cohen's kappa 0.18). In 16 episodes where mcfDNA detected a pathogen not recovered by culture, 8 across 3 participants represented predictive detections - the same organism subsequently confirmed as causing invasive infection 2-46 days later, including fatal extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas pneumonia, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcal surgical site infection, and candidemia. Long-read sequencing had low yield due to contaminating human DNA. Quantitative mcfDNA burden correlated positively with multiple alveolar inflammatory biomarkers. BAL mcfDNA metagenomics identified clinically relevant pathogens not recovered by conventional culture, including predictive detections and non-culturable organisms, supporting a role for metagenomic surveillance in the early post-transplant period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.