ArticleWellcome open research2026
Effect of a community-based intervention for cardiovascular risk factor control on stroke mortality in rural Gadchiroli, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death globally. We tested whether it was feasible to deliver a community-based intervention package for prevention of stroke and, whether such an intervention would reduce stroke mortality in a rural underserved community in central India. Methods: In this two-arm, parallel group, open label, cluster randomised controlled trial, 64 villages were randomly assigned with 1:1 allocation to the control and the intervention arm in a demographic surveillance site. The intervention was delivered for 3.5 years. It included community-based screening for hypertension, diabetes and stroke among individuals ≥ 50 years of age by trained community health workers followed by village-based treatment by an outreach physician, awareness generation and active follow up. In the control arm, households were provided information on the ill effects of tobacco and steps to quit it. Cause of death was ascertained on all deaths using verbal autopsies by physician coders who were blinded to the treatment allocation. Results: There were 7671 individuals in the control arm and 8255 in the intervention arm who were ≥ 50 years of age. In the intervention arm, out of 8255 eligible individuals, 8026 were screened and 2793 were diagnosed with hypertension, 317 with diabetes and 182 with stroke and those with these three conditions received the intervention. The stroke mortality rate per 100,000 person-years in the last 2.5 years of the intervention, which was the primary outcome of the trial, was comparable in the intervention (416.7) and the control arm (484.9) (adjusted hazard ration [HR] 0.84, 95 % confidence interval [0.62,1.12]; p = 0.23). Important limitations include limited access to brain imaging and lipid profile measurements. Conclusions: In this under resourced rural community in central India, a community-based intervention for stroke risk reduction did not reduce stroke mortality over the final 2.5 years of the trial. However, the trial intervention was acceptable and led to improved medication compliance, blood pressure control and awareness about stroke. Trial registration: The trial was registered at the Clinical Trials Registry of India: CTRI/2015/12/006424.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.