Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786889›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Imagery Rescripting for Pathological Affective Dependence in Intimate Partner Violence (ImRs-PAD): An In-Person Proof-of-Concept Study.

Erica Pugliese, Allison Uvelli, Maria Grazia Foschino Barbaro, Carolina Papa, Federica Visco-Comandini, Francesco Mancini, Arnold A P van Emmerik

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06670326 (Imagery Rescripting As a Treatment for Pathological Affective Dependence), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06670326 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Imagery Rescripting As a Treatment for Pathological Affective Dependence: Helping Victims Break Free from Abusive Relationships

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AmsterdamRan2025 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsPathological Affective DependenceArmsImagery Rescripting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica PuglieseDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-6580
Allison UvelliDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3133
Maria Grazia Foschino BarbaroAssociazione Italiana di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (AIPC), Bari, Italy.
Carolina PapaAssociazione di Psicologia Cognitiva (APC) and Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (SPC), Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6417-6509
Federica Visco-ComandiniAssociazione di Psicologia Cognitiva (APC) and Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (SPC), Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-2320
Francesco ManciniAssociazione di Psicologia Cognitiva (APC) and Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (SPC), Rome, Italy.
Arnold A P van EmmerikDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-5631

Funding

Stichting Achmea Slachtoffer en Samenleving (SASS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary effects of in-person Imagery Rescripting for Pathological Affective Dependence (ImRs-PAD), a trauma-focused and mechanism-based intervention for survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). ImRs-PAD targets trauma-related relational dynamics-specifically Pathological Affective Dependence (PAD)-together with the related relational processes that may contribute to difficulties disengaging from abusive relationships. PAD is conceptualized as a relational constraint rooted in trauma, rather than individual pathology or responsibility. This study employed an exploratory single-arm repeated-measures proof-of-concept design conducted in Italy. Eighteen adult women survivors of IPV received a 13-session ImRs-PAD intervention, delivered within anti-violence services by supervised psychotherapy trainees. Primary outcomes included state and trait levels of PAD, relational commitment and intention to return to the abusive relationship, which were conceived as different, although potentially overlapping self-report indicators of relational entrapment. Secondary outcomes assessed complex trauma symptoms, psychological well-being and resilience. Participants were assessed at baseline/pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment and 1-month follow-up. Significant reductions were observed in PAD, relational commitment and intention to return over the course of the intervention. Improvements were also noted in trauma-related symptoms, psychological well-being and resilience from baseline to post-treatment. At 1-month follow-up, changes in the primary relational outcomes and resilience were largely maintained, whereas trauma-related symptoms showed slight attenuation but remained significantly improved relative to baseline. ImRs-PAD appears to be a feasible and promising intervention in real-world anti-violence centre settings, specifically targeting unmet relational needs implicated in IPV-related entrapment. Changes in the primary relational outcomes were more consistently maintained at follow-up than improvements in trauma-related symptoms after treatment termination, suggesting the potential importance of integrating such interventions within broader systems of psychosocial support. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06670326.

Indexed as

Imagery, PsychotherapyIntimate Partner ViolenceMood DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedProof of Concept StudyTreatment Outcomeimagery rescriptingintimate partner violencepathological affective dependencepsychological interventionrelational entrapmenttrauma‐related processes

Identifiers

PMID42786889
PMCPMC13613076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.