Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786709›Full record

Observational studyMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026

Routine 24-Hour Fluid Balance and Short-Term Fluid Change in Critically Ill Patients: A Pro-spective Agreement Study.

Michal Kalina, Ondřej Jíra, Vladimír Černý

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal KalinaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1567-8239
Ondřej JíraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Vladimír ČernýDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Twenty-four-hour fluid balance is routinely used as a surrogate marker of net fluid change in critically ill patients and frequently influences bedside clinical decision-making, including assessment of volume status and fluid management strategies. However, despite its widespread use in intensive care practice, the reliability and accuracy of this routinely recorded parameter as a measure of short-term fluid change remain uncertain. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study comparing cumulative 24-hour fluid balance with 24-hour body weight change measured over identical time intervals in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Paired measurements were collected and analyzed to evaluate the agreement between these 2 commonly used approaches for estimating short-term fluid changes. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, including regression-based evaluation of proportional bias. Clinically acceptable agreement was predefined as a difference within ± 1 kg between methods. RESULTS A total of 360 paired observations were analyzed. The mean bias between methods was small (0.082 kg), indicating minimal systematic difference at the population level. However, agreement at the individual level was poor, with wide 95% limits of agreement (-2.1 to +2.264 kg), exceeding the predefined threshold for clinical acceptability. Clinically significant disagreement (> 1 kg) occurred in 30.2% of observations. Proportional bias was present, with increasing discrepancy between methods across the range of measured values, suggesting that disagreement was not consistent across different levels of fluid change. CONCLUSIONS Routinely charted 24-hour fluid balance demonstrates clinically unacceptable agreement with body weight change and should not be considered an interchangeable measure of short-term fluid change in critically ill patients. An integrated approach combining fluid balance assessment, serial body weight measurements, and comprehensive clinical evaluation is recommended to improve assessment of fluid status and guide individualized patient management.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessWater-Electrolyte BalanceAgedBody WeightCritical CareFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42786709
PMCPMC13644462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.