ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Seeing and deciding to help: neural and attentional mechanisms of prosociality in younger and older adults.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prosociality plays a crucial role in social functioning across the lifespan. However, the neural and attentional mechanisms underlying age-related differences in prosociality remain to be understudied. In this study, we used task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging and eye tracking to investigate the behavioural, neural, and attentional mechanisms underlying prosocial intentions in 35 younger adults aged 18-31 and 35 older adults aged 60-72 across helping, sharing, and comforting. Behaviourally, older adults reported a greater likelihood of helping than younger adults, while no age differences were observed in sharing or comforting. Older adults showed reduced activation in regions implicated in mentalising and cognitive control, including the right temporoparietal junction and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, during sharing and comforting. Older adults also showed attenuated connectivity between prefrontal and temporoparietal regions during sharing. Eye-tracking results revealed that older adults were more likely than younger adults to visually scan recipients across conditions. Brain-behaviour analyses indicated that helping intentions were associated with stronger connectivity of cognitive control regions with mentalising regions and weaker connectivity with affective processing regions. These findings suggest that distinct neural activation, functional connectivity, and attentional deployment patterns support age-related differences in prosociality, highlighting the value of a multimodal approach to understanding prosocial decision-making throughout adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.