Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786659›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

'No Dumping!' Threshold Work in Voluntary Sector Mental Healthcare in Inner-City London.

Natassia Brenman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Natassia BrenmanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-2129

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/V011200/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the sociomaterial dynamics of mental healthcare by following metaphors circulating among voluntary sector providers that they were becoming 'dumping grounds' within a system in crisis. In the United Kingdom, the voluntary sector has long been called upon to deliver flexible, community-based care that reduces pressure on primary and secondary services. Under chronic conditions of austerity, however, providers have been stretched beyond their capacity. Drawing on ethnographic research across three voluntary sector mental health sites in inner-city London, I analyse how providers made and maintained places of care while grappling with expanding and shifting demands. Taking a sociomaterial approach, I propose the analytic concept of 'threshold work' to complicate the dumping metaphor and to reconceptualise how material thresholds of place and immaterial thresholds of mental health need are co-constituted with care practices. I identify three interrelated modes of threshold work through which providers manage the limits of inclusion, revealing how diagnostic boundaries of need and spatial arrangements of care move together, shaping the terms and conditions of care in the city.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental Health ServicesAnthropology, CulturalHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLondonMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID42786659
PMCPMC13612939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.