ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
'No Dumping!' Threshold Work in Voluntary Sector Mental Healthcare in Inner-City London.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper examines the sociomaterial dynamics of mental healthcare by following metaphors circulating among voluntary sector providers that they were becoming 'dumping grounds' within a system in crisis. In the United Kingdom, the voluntary sector has long been called upon to deliver flexible, community-based care that reduces pressure on primary and secondary services. Under chronic conditions of austerity, however, providers have been stretched beyond their capacity. Drawing on ethnographic research across three voluntary sector mental health sites in inner-city London, I analyse how providers made and maintained places of care while grappling with expanding and shifting demands. Taking a sociomaterial approach, I propose the analytic concept of 'threshold work' to complicate the dumping metaphor and to reconceptualise how material thresholds of place and immaterial thresholds of mental health need are co-constituted with care practices. I identify three interrelated modes of threshold work through which providers manage the limits of inclusion, revealing how diagnostic boundaries of need and spatial arrangements of care move together, shaping the terms and conditions of care in the city.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.