ArticleBMC psychology2026
Assessing Swedish genetic counselling outcome measures for autism and general use: Rasch findings highlight the need for improved measures.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic counselling outcome measures are increasingly adapted for diverse clinical contexts. While the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is available in Swedish, no autism-specific version has been developed.
methodsWe adapted the Swedish GCOS-24 using the English version of the modified GCOS-24 (mGCOS-24) to create a Swedish autism-specific mGCOS-24. Thereafter, we evaluated both the Swedish autism mGCOS-24 and the Swedish general GCOS-24 using Rasch analysis to assess their psychometric properties.
resultsBoth instruments exhibited structural challenges, including multidimensionality, disordered thresholds, local item dependence, and invariance issues. For the Swedish autism mGCOS-24, we were able to identify subscales with acceptable measurement properties. However, applying the same structure to the Swedish general GCOS-24 did not resolve its broader limitations.
conclusionsThis study introduces the first Swedish autism‑specific mGCOS‑24 and represents the first Rasch‑based evaluation of any GCOS‑24 or mGCOS‑24 in Swedish. Our findings highlight important opportunities for outcome measure refinement but also indicate that new or more substantially adapted tools may be needed to capture outcomes of genetic counselling in autistic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.